Call It Asstoria

September 13th, 2006


Brooklyn is the worst place on earth for a writer,” says Sara Gran–but what does she know about the cement trucks of Astoria?

NYT - The Sequel

December 7th, 2005

Next week’s the review. In two weeks, this:

Click for more

The NYT Seal of Approval

December 6th, 2005

Writers love identical twins. What tidier way to show different sides of one character, explore possible life paths or test the limits of nature and nuture? Dermansky does all that, but her twins (who take turns at narrating) transcend the gimmick in a brainy, emotionally sophisticated bildungsroman-for-two. Chloe, the elder by four minutes, longs for a life of her own, independent of her clingy sister, Sue, who envies her (Chloe is an eighth of an inch taller) and thinks she’s smarter and prettier. Sue adores Chloe, whose every gesture toward independence sends her into paroxysms of jealousy. On their 13th birthday, she wheedles and bullies Chloe into getting tattoos – with each twin bearing the other twin’s name. “Sue thought tattoos would prove to the world that the bond we shared went deeper than DNA,” Chloe explains. “The funy thing was, the tattoos made us different. When we died, it would be easy for a forensic scientist to tell us apart. …After we got tattoos, we were never really and truly the same.” Both twins are obsessive, vulnerable, ambitious and hungry for love, but these qualities take on different forms. Chloe keeps her room in perfect order, setting herself apart from her untidy sister, while Sue vomits up her meals in an effort to stay the same weight as Chloe, who intently counts her calories. Yet as they mature and their circumstances change, they find themselves swapping roles. Most teenage protagonists have to learn what it means to be themselves, but Sue and Chloe have an extra task: learning what it means to be – or not to be – each other. (New York Times Book Review, December 11, 2005.)

Romance

April 15th, 2005

Thanks to Jordan’s line on cheap tickets, we checked out the new Mamet play last night. “Romance” is a deliciously angry farce in which the all-male cast, largely confined to a court room, spews hatred at one another for long stretches of time, when they’re not busy cutting each other off, vintage Mamet-style. (”Sheeny kike Christkilling cocksucker” is one of the gentler insults. Retort: “Is little Tommy limping when he comes home from communion?”) Ostensibly, the play is about a — you know what, just read the review in the Guardian. And see this if you can: Mamet’s in fine form.

Mamet’s fictive courtroom owes a debt to Lewis Carroll and Kafka. A Jewish chiropractor is in the dock for some unspecified offence; as proceedings spiral out of control, private fears are publicly revealed. The judge is a nervous racist who at one point enquires if Shakespeare was a Jew. The prosecutor is an establishment pillar tormented by his gay lover. In the play’s most biliously comic scene, the defendant consults with his loathed Catholic attorney: “God forgive me, what have I done?” he asks. “I hired a Goy lawyer! It’s like going to a straight hairdresser.” To which his anti-semitic attorney responds: “You people can’t even order a cheese sandwich without mentioning the Holocaust.” That’s just for openers in a breathtaking catalogue of racist abuse.

Interview in New York
The NYT: “pushing an envelope that has already been through the shredder.”